<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jim Beam to Give Us The &#8220;Devil&#8217;s Cut&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bourbonbuzz.com/2011/02/24/jim-beam-to-give-us-the-devils-cut/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bourbonbuzz.com/2011/02/24/jim-beam-to-give-us-the-devils-cut/</link>
	<description>The Latest Buzz About Bourbon Whiskey</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:31:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis reynolds</title>
		<link>http://bourbonbuzz.com/2011/02/24/jim-beam-to-give-us-the-devils-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-900</link>
		<dc:creator>dennis reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 16:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonbuzz.com/?p=1188#comment-900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bought a bottle while touring the plant. I really like it and want to know where I can buy it where I live in the St. Louis area. I haven&#039;t seen any on the local shelves yet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bought a bottle while touring the plant. I really like it and want to know where I can buy it where I live in the St. Louis area. I haven&#8217;t seen any on the local shelves yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Beam Sells Their Soul For The Devil&#8217;s Cut &#171; It&#039;s just the booze dancing&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://bourbonbuzz.com/2011/02/24/jim-beam-to-give-us-the-devils-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-859</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Beam Sells Their Soul For The Devil&#8217;s Cut &#171; It&#039;s just the booze dancing&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonbuzz.com/?p=1188#comment-859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] an episode of Justified on FX. Later that same month, they announced that they would be releasing a brand new Bourbon called Devil&#8217;s Cut. We&#8217;ve written about Jim Beam&#8217;s Devil&#8217;s Cut Bourbon before. Here&#8217;s what The [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an episode of Justified on FX. Later that same month, they announced that they would be releasing a brand new Bourbon called Devil&#8217;s Cut. We&#8217;ve written about Jim Beam&#8217;s Devil&#8217;s Cut Bourbon before. Here&#8217;s what The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe riggs</title>
		<link>http://bourbonbuzz.com/2011/02/24/jim-beam-to-give-us-the-devils-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-856</link>
		<dc:creator>joe riggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 21:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonbuzz.com/?p=1188#comment-856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is still a bourbon because they make it out of 51% corn, distilled no stronger than 160 proof, barreled below 125 proof, they age it in new charred white oak barrels and age it for minimum of 2 years, nothing added, bottled at a minimum of 80 proof.  whether they pour it out of  the barrel or squeeze it out of a barrel it is still bourbon.  I just bought a bottle today and look forward to the tasting tonight. Hoping it is reminiscent of Pappy VanWinkle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is still a bourbon because they make it out of 51% corn, distilled no stronger than 160 proof, barreled below 125 proof, they age it in new charred white oak barrels and age it for minimum of 2 years, nothing added, bottled at a minimum of 80 proof.  whether they pour it out of  the barrel or squeeze it out of a barrel it is still bourbon.  I just bought a bottle today and look forward to the tasting tonight. Hoping it is reminiscent of Pappy VanWinkle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://bourbonbuzz.com/2011/02/24/jim-beam-to-give-us-the-devils-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-853</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 02:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonbuzz.com/?p=1188#comment-853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About calling Devil&#039;s Cut &quot;bourbon&quot;......

I had a similar question in regards to another bourbon recently, and after some digging here is what I found:

By law, as we all know, bourbon cannot be artifically flavored or colored, but what I learned is the law states that bourbon cannot be artificially flavored or colored BEFORE MATURATION.  Second argument is that becasue the &quot;extract&quot; that Beam is pulling out of the barrels is just whiskey that has been soaked up, this would not bean &quot;artifical&quot; flavor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About calling Devil&#8217;s Cut &#8220;bourbon&#8221;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>I had a similar question in regards to another bourbon recently, and after some digging here is what I found:</p>
<p>By law, as we all know, bourbon cannot be artifically flavored or colored, but what I learned is the law states that bourbon cannot be artificially flavored or colored BEFORE MATURATION.  Second argument is that becasue the &#8220;extract&#8221; that Beam is pulling out of the barrels is just whiskey that has been soaked up, this would not bean &#8220;artifical&#8221; flavor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://bourbonbuzz.com/2011/02/24/jim-beam-to-give-us-the-devils-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonbuzz.com/?p=1188#comment-836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Den makes a good point.  I mean, I tried this, and I like it just fine, but how can they legally call it bourbon?  It seems sketchy to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Den makes a good point.  I mean, I tried this, and I like it just fine, but how can they legally call it bourbon?  It seems sketchy to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://bourbonbuzz.com/2011/02/24/jim-beam-to-give-us-the-devils-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 21:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonbuzz.com/?p=1188#comment-832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was at the Jim Beam Distillery on Friday July 8 (2 days ago) and they allowed me to taste test Devils Cut alongside the new Knob Creek Single Barrel. I found the Devils cut to have a very spicy woody flavor, a good nose, and a strong but noy bad after taste. I did like it and I was thinking of buying it then and there. When I tasted the Knob Creek Single barrel, I found it to be very smooth and sophisticated - the epitome of what we are looking for. Since I was traveling that day in a very small sports car, I wanted to buy only one bottle. So I bought the Knob Creek Single barrel. I will buy the Devils Cut at a later time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was at the Jim Beam Distillery on Friday July 8 (2 days ago) and they allowed me to taste test Devils Cut alongside the new Knob Creek Single Barrel. I found the Devils cut to have a very spicy woody flavor, a good nose, and a strong but noy bad after taste. I did like it and I was thinking of buying it then and there. When I tasted the Knob Creek Single barrel, I found it to be very smooth and sophisticated &#8211; the epitome of what we are looking for. Since I was traveling that day in a very small sports car, I wanted to buy only one bottle. So I bought the Knob Creek Single barrel. I will buy the Devils Cut at a later time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://bourbonbuzz.com/2011/02/24/jim-beam-to-give-us-the-devils-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-831</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 10:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonbuzz.com/?p=1188#comment-831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is still a straight bourbon whiskey because every drop has adhered to the law governing the name. There is no difference if you take what is loose in the barrel as a opposed to &quot;squeezing&quot; it out of the barrel staves.  For the legal requirements to use the name see straight bourbon:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bourbon_whiskey#Legal_requirements]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is still a straight bourbon whiskey because every drop has adhered to the law governing the name. There is no difference if you take what is loose in the barrel as a opposed to &#8220;squeezing&#8221; it out of the barrel staves.  For the legal requirements to use the name see straight bourbon:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bourbon_whiskey#Legal_requirements" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bourbon_whiskey#Legal_requirements</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://bourbonbuzz.com/2011/02/24/jim-beam-to-give-us-the-devils-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 13:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonbuzz.com/?p=1188#comment-828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I just had some last night and yes it is stronger.  I think has a little bit at the end for the strong finish.  But as a product I would recommend it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I just had some last night and yes it is stronger.  I think has a little bit at the end for the strong finish.  But as a product I would recommend it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
